| The
                derivation of Purcell however is somewhat dubious. Mainly so
                because the velocity of the test charge is unrealistically
                taken to be always the same as the charge velocity in the wire.
                So, when the test
                charge doubles it speed, the current I
                through the wire is also doubled and the magnetic force
                is quadrupled. This however, makes it impossible to determine if
                the contributions to the
                higher magnetic force come from either the higher current I,
                the higher speed v,
                or both.   The
                electrons in a real live wire drift with a wide range of
                different velocities which together produce
                the current I.
                We�ll discuss our derivation, which starts of with just the
                current I
                through the
                wire and the speed v
                of the test-charge. Surprisingly, this derivation turns out to
                be even
                simpler as Purcell�s. (for the case of the charge moving
                parallel to the wire).   We�ll
                also derive the case where the charge is moving perpendicular to
                the wire. The required charge
                density is derived for a current carrying wire in order to be
                neutral in the rest-frame. To be
                self consistent we will derive the relativistic EM Potential and
                the relativistic Electrostatic Field
                for a point particle from the classical EM wave equations in a
                way which is both short and
                simple.  
               |